Characteristics of different galaxy types, including star formation rates and morphological evolution
In the tapestry of the observable universe, galaxies appear in a surprising diversity of shapes and sizes—from graceful spiral arms lined with star-forming regions to huge elliptical “balls” of aging stars, and even chaotic, irregular forms that defy easy categorization. This wide variety stirred early astronomers to seek a classification system that could highlight both morphological features and possible evolutionary connections.
The most enduring framework is Hubble’s tuning fork classification, proposed in the 1920s and refined over decades to include subdivisions and finer gradations. Today, astronomers continue to use these broad groupings— spirals, ellipticals, and irregulars—to describe galaxy populations. In this article, we will delve into the features of each major type, their star formation properties, and how morphological evolution may unfold over cosmic time.
1. Historical Background and the Tuning Fork
1.1 Hubble’s Original Scheme
In 1926, Edwin Hubble published a seminal paper outlining his morphological classification of galaxies [1]. He arranged galaxies in a “tuning fork” diagram:
- Ellipticals (E) on the left branch—ranging from nearly circular (E0) to highly elongated (E7).
- Spirals (S) and Barred Spirals (SB) on the right branch—unbarred spirals along one prong, barred spirals along the other, further subdivided by the prominence of the central bulge and the openness of spiral arms (Sa, Sb, Sc, etc.).
- Lenticulars (S0) bridging the gap between ellipticals and spirals, featuring a disk but lacking prominent spiral structure.
Later, other astronomers (e.g., Allan Sandage, Gérard de Vaucouleurs) refined Hubble’s original system, adding more nuance to morphological details (e.g., ringed structures, subtle bar forms, flocculent vs. grand-design spirals).
1.2 The Tuning Fork and Evolutionary Hypothesis
Hubble originally (and tentatively) suggested that ellipticals might evolve into spirals through some internal process. Later research largely overturned that notion: modern understanding sees these classes as divergent outcomes of different formation histories, though mergers and secular evolution can, in certain contexts, transform morphologies. The “tuning fork” remains a powerful descriptive tool, but does not necessarily represent a strict evolutionary sequence.
2. Elliptical Galaxies (E)
2.1 Morphology and Classification
Ellipticals are often smooth, featureless “balls” of light, with little visible structure. They are labeled E0 through E7 based on increasing ellipticity (E0 being nearly round, E7 very elongated). Some aspects:
- Minimal Disk: Unlike spirals, ellipticals lack a significant disk component, with stars orbiting in more random orbits.
- Older, Redder Stars: The stellar population is typically dominated by older, low-mass stars, giving an overall red color.
- Little Gas or Dust: Ellipticals often have minimal cold gas, though some, especially giant ellipticals in clusters, may contain hot X-ray gas in extended halos.
2.2 Star Formation Rates and Populations
Ellipticals generally have very low current star formation—the reservoir of cold gas is scarce. Their star formation peaked early in cosmic history, creating large spheroids of old, metal-rich stars. In some ellipticals, small episodes of new star formation can be triggered by minor mergers or gas accretion, but this is uncommon.
2.3 Formation Scenarios
Modern theory suggests that giant ellipticals often form through major mergers of disk galaxies. These violent interactions randomize stellar orbits, creating a spheroidal distribution [2, 3]. Smaller ellipticals might arise from less dramatic processes, but the essential theme is that significant mass assembly or merging typically transitions a galaxy away from spiral structure, quenching star formation.
3. Spiral Galaxies (S)
3.1 General Features
Spiral galaxies are characterized by rotating disks of stars and gas, often with a central bulge. Their disk supports spiral arms, which can be grand and well-defined or more patchy (“flocculent”). Hubble subdivided spirals primarily by:
-
Sa, Sb, Sc sequences:
- Sa: Large, luminous bulge, tightly wound arms.
- Sb: Intermediate bulge-to-disk ratio, more open arms.
- Sc: Small bulge, loosely wound arms, more extended star-forming regions.
- Barred Spirals (SB): A bar-like structure crosses the central bulge; subcategories SBa, SBb, SBc mirror the above bulge and arm differences.
3.2 Star Formation Rates
Spirals tend to be the most actively star-forming of the major classes (aside from some starbursts in irregular systems). Gas in the disk collapses along spiral density waves, sparking continuous formation of new stars. The distribution of blue, luminous stars in the arms underscores this ongoing process. Observational data show that later-type spirals (Sc, Sd) often harbor more star formation relative to total mass, reflecting larger reservoirs of cold gas [4].
3.3 Galactic Disks and Bulges
A spiral’s disk contains much of its cold interstellar medium (ISM) and younger stars, while its bulge is often older and more spheroidal. The ratio of bulge mass to disk mass correlates with Hubble type (Sa galaxies have a bigger bulge fraction than Sc). Bars can funnel gas from the disk inward, feeding the bulge or central black hole, and sometimes fueling starbursts or active galactic nuclei (AGN).
4. Lenticular Galaxies (S0)
S0 galaxies, sometimes called “lenticulars,” occupy an intermediate morphological slot—retaining a disk like a spiral but lacking significant spiral arms or star-forming regions. Their disks can be relatively gas-poor, more akin to elliptical populations in terms of color (older, red stars). S0s are often found in cluster environments, where ram-pressure stripping or galaxy “harassment” might remove their gas, halting star formation and effectively “turning” a spiral into an S0 [5].
5. Irregular Galaxies (Irr)
5.1 Hallmarks of Irregulars
Irregular galaxies defy the neat structural classification of spirals or ellipticals. They exhibit chaotic shapes, often lacking a bulge or coherent disk pattern, with scattered star-forming clusters or dust patches. There are two broad sub-types:
- Irr I: Some partial or vestigial structure, possibly resembling a disrupted spiral disk.
- Irr II: Extremely amorphous, with no discernible systematic structure.
5.2 Star Formation and External Influences
Irregulars are typically small or medium in stellar mass but can have disproportionately high star formation rates relative to their size (e.g., the Large Magellanic Cloud). Gravitational interactions with more massive neighbors, tidal forces, or recent mergers can all produce irregular morphologies and spark starbursts [6]. In a low-density environment, a small galaxy might remain irregular if it never accreted enough mass to form a stable disk.
6. Star Formation Rates Across Morphologies
Galaxies along the Hubble “tuning fork” spectrum also form a continuum in star formation rates (SFR) and stellar population properties:
- Late-Type Spirals (Sc, Sd) and many Irregulars: High gas fraction, elevated SFR, younger mean stellar ages, more blue light from massive new stars.
- Early-Type Spirals (Sa, Sb): Moderately active star formation, less gas, more substantial bulge.
- Lenticulars (S0) and Ellipticals: Typically “red and dead,” minimal ongoing star formation, older stellar population.
This mapping from morphological class to star formation is not absolute—mergers or interactions can cause elliptical galaxies to acquire gas or trigger star formation, while certain spirals may be quiescent if star-forming gas is exhausted. Nevertheless, broad statistical trends hold in large surveys [7].
7. Evolutionary Paths: Mergers and Secular Processes
7.1 Mergers: A Key Driver
One major route for morphological transformation is galaxy mergers. When two spirals of comparable mass collide, the violent gravitational torques often funnel gas to the center, triggering a starburst and, eventually, building a more spheroidal structure if the merger is major. Repeated mergers over cosmic time can form giant ellipticals in cluster cores. Minor mergers or satellite accretion can also warp disks or promote bar formation, slightly nudging a spiral’s classification.
7.2 Secular Evolution
Not all morphological change requires external collisions. Secular evolution involves internal processes over longer timescales:
- Bar Instabilities: Bars can drive gas inward, fueling central star formation or AGN, possibly building a pseudo-bulge.
- Spiral Arm Dynamics: Over time, wave patterns can reorganize stellar orbits, gradually reshaping the disk.
- Environmental Stripping: Galaxies in clusters may lose gas due to hot intracluster medium interactions, drifting from a star-forming spiral to a gas-poor S0.
These subtle transformations highlight that morphological classification is not always static but can shift in response to environment, feedback, and internal dynamical processes [8].
8. Observational Insights and Modern Refinements
8.1 Deep Surveys and High-Redshift Galaxies
Telescopes like Hubble, JWST, and large ground-based observatories track galaxies to earlier cosmic epochs. These high-redshift systems sometimes do not fit neatly into local morphological categories—frequent “clumpy” disks, irregular star-forming regions, or compact massive “nuggets.” Over cosmic time, many of these eventually settle into more standard spiral or elliptical morphologies, implying that the Hubble sequence is partially a late-time phenomenon.
8.2 Quantitative Morphology
Beyond visual inspection, astronomers use parameters like the Sérsic index, Gini coefficient, M20, and other metrics to quantitatively measure light distributions and clumpiness. These efforts complement the classical Hubble system, enabling large, automated surveys to categorize thousands or millions of galaxies systematically [9].
8.3 Unusual Types
Some galaxies defy simple classification. Ring galaxies, polar-ring galaxies, and peanut-bulge galaxies reveal exotic formation histories (e.g., collisions, bars, or tidal accretion). They remind us that morphological classification is a convenient but not fully exhaustive scheme.
9. Cosmological Context: The Hubble Sequence Over Time
A big question remains: How does the fraction of spiral vs. elliptical vs. irregular galaxies change over cosmic history? Observations show:
- Irregular/peculiar galaxies appear more common at higher redshifts, likely reflecting intense mergers and unsettled structures in the early universe.
- Spiral galaxies seem abundant across a broad range of epochs, albeit often more gas-rich and clumpy in the past.
- Ellipticals become more prevalent in cluster environments and at later times, when hierarchical merging has built massive, quiescent systems.
Cosmological simulations attempt to reproduce these evolutionary pathways, matching the distributions of morphological types at different redshifts.
10. Concluding Thoughts
Hubble’s galaxy classification has proven remarkably enduring despite nearly a century of astronomical progress. Spirals, ellipticals, and irregulars represent broad morphological families that correlate strongly with star formation histories, environment, and large-scale dynamics. Yet, behind these convenient labels lies a complex network of evolutionary routes—mergers, secular processes, and feedback—that can reshape galaxies over billions of years.
The synergy of deep imaging, high-resolution spectroscopy, and numerical simulations continues to refine our view of how galaxies transition from one morphological state to another. Whether unveiling the red-and-dead elliptical giants in cluster cores, the luminous spiral arms lighting up galactic disks, or the chaotic irregular forms in dwarf starbursts, the cosmic zoo of galaxies remains one of the richest fields in astronomy—ensuring that Hubble’s classification scheme, while classical, evolves along with our expanding understanding of the universe.
References and Further Reading
- Hubble, E. (1926). “Extra-galactic nebulae.” The Astrophysical Journal, 64, 321–369.
- Toomre, A. (1977). “Mergers and some consequences.” Evolution of Galaxies and Stellar Populations, Yale Univ. Obs., 401–426.
- Barnes, J. E., & Hernquist, L. (1992). “Dynamics of interacting galaxies.” Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 30, 705–742.
- Kennicutt, R. C. (1998). “Star Formation in Galaxies Along the Hubble Sequence.” Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 36, 189–232.
- Dressler, A. (1980). “Galaxy morphology in rich clusters – Implications for the formation and evolution of galaxies.” The Astrophysical Journal, 236, 351–365.
- Schweizer, F. (1998). “Galactic Mergers: Facts and Fancy.” SaAS FeS, 11, 105–120.
- Blanton, M. R., & Moustakas, J. (2009). “Physical Properties and Environments of Star-forming Galaxies.” Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 47, 159–210.
- Kormendy, J., & Kennicutt, R. C. (2004). “Secular Evolution and the Formation of Pseudobulges in Disk Galaxies.” Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 42, 603–683.
- Conselice, C. J. (2014). “The Evolution of Galaxy Structure Over Cosmic Time.” Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 52, 291–337.